
Accordingly, the Progressive Democrats of America this year is organizing like-minded Dems to join "progressive slates" in Assembly District races everywhere. The idea, according to a website dedicated to the project, is that "the power to change our party comes from a cohesive group of individuals dedicated to making change happen" (which is funny, since one might do worse than "a cohesive group of individuals dedicated to making change happen" as a definition of a political party in the first place, though I suppose it works just as well as the definition of a faction). To be a "progressive" -- again, according to the site -- is to believe in universal healthcare, to oppose pre-emptive war, and to oppose the death penalty, among other principles (nothing in there about a worker's right to join a union....oh, well). Their policy platform calls for immediate withdrawal from Iraq, clean elections, "elimination of poverty" (big enough?), and "investigations toward impeachment."
So far, their efforts seem to be gaining some traction, at least among bloggers. DDay's post on MyDD and cross-post on Calitics have sparked lively discussion threads, and who knows if Chris Bowers' entreaty back in early December was what drove the unwashed masses to the barricades in the first place? If you believe what you read on blog comments, it sounds like there's at least a handful of reasonably organized rank-and-filers running slates, and if you believe idle chatter from electeds and their aides, at least a couple of them are serious enough to pay attention to, if not necessarily to fear.
However these slates play out, next weekend's DSCC elections should be at least a little more interesting than usual.